State Environmental Justice Leadership Landscape
Exhaustive research for OEJE Staff Training benchmarking | Compiled Friday, May 9, 2026 | JJRconsulting
What this resource is and how to use it
This landscape research profiles 16 states and federal resources that are leading, building or laying the foundation for environmental justice programs. It was compiled to help OEJE staff understand where Massachusetts fits in the national EJ landscape and to identify models, tools and lessons that can inform staff training design.
Each state profile includes legislation, dedicated offices, screening tools, training programs and highlights. Use the search bar, ranking filters or category buttons to find what is most relevant to your work. Click any state to expand its full profile with source links.
Explore the full EJ training resource collection
EJ Glossary of Terms80+ terms with definitions, context, evolving perspectives and MA-specific guidance EJ Scholar Deep Profiles14 scholars and thought leaders shaping EJ policy, science and practice Founding Generation EJ Scholars8 pioneering scholars and activists who built the field of environmental justice State EJ Landscape Research16 states and federal resources with EJ programs, policies and models National EJ LandscapeFederal agencies, national organizations and cross-cutting EJ resources Cutting-Edge EJ ResearchEmerging research, tools and innovative approaches in environmental justice EJ Training Curricula and ModelsTraining programs, toolkits and learning resources from across the field JEDI-CAB Quality FrameworkHow the framework was applied to these resources and prompts for your own workWhy This Research Matters for Massachusetts
This research covers 16 states and federal resources, organized to help OEJE staff understand where Massachusetts fits in the national EJ landscape. States are ranked using an asset-based framework that recognizes every state is on a journey. The key finding: no state has built a comprehensive, mandatory EJ training curriculum for all agency staff comparable to what Massachusetts OEJE is designing. This represents an extraordinary opportunity for MA to lead nationally.
Synthesis: Implications for Massachusetts OEJE Staff Training
Recognizing the national staff training gap
No state has built a comprehensive, mandatory EJ training curriculum for all agency staff comparable to what Massachusetts OEJE is designing. The closest models are:
- California's CCORE/GARE approach: 50+ agencies, 500+ employees trained in racial equity (broader than EJ-specific)
- Washington's HEAL Act training: Focused on EHD map usage and EJ assessment methodology for 7 agencies
- Michigan's EGLE trainings: Agency-specific EJ training with MiEJScreen integration
Features to benchmark against
- Screening tools: CA (CalEnviroScreen), WA (EHD Map), MI (MiEJScreen), NJ (EJMAP), NY (DAC Map), MN (MNRISKS)
- Cumulative impacts in permitting: NJ (mandatory permit denial), IL (HB 4093), CT (PA 23-202)
- Ombudsperson model: CO (unique advocate role between communities and government)
- Multi-agency coordination: WA (7 agencies under HEAL), VA (10 EJ coordinators), OR (16 agency liaisons)
- Investment targeting: NY (35-40% of climate funds to DACs), CA (25-35% of cap-and-trade)
- Advisory board structure: MI (21 members), CT (23 members), CO (Task Force + Board + Ombudsperson)
Opportunity for MA leadership
Massachusetts is positioned to become the first state with a comprehensive, structured EJ staff training program that goes beyond tool-specific training or general racial equity education. The OEJE training design, with module-based curriculum, vignettes, agency-specific content and multi-agency coverage, would be nationally significant.